Although Hollywood dramatizations might suggest differently, a suspect undergoing interrogation by law enforcement officials does have procedural rights. For example, the Fourth Amendment offers protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Similarly, case law provided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona and subsequent decisions ensures the right of a suspect in policy custody and under interrogation to have an attorney present and/or invoke the right to be silent. If the latter right is invoked, the interrogation must stop. Yet a recent article provides a note of caution, suggesting that misconduct and false confessions may still occur during recorded
Continue Reading Will video recordings protect a criminal defendant’s rights?